The Wisconsin Homegrown Lunch Project
Linking the Land and the Lunchroom-
By Heather Stouder and Sara
Tedeschi
Each and every week, we see
or hear about it in the media. The consequences of poor health and diet
have skyrocketed in the U.S., and something must be done about it.
Speedy marketers have responded with adjustments in product lines
and advertising- notice the proliferation of “low-carb” products, fast
food salads, and more! Despite this, many in agribusiness marketing continue to
shape unhealthy eating behaviors in children, and the most common school
meals are highly processed, and resemble fast food items. Concurrently, small and mid-sized farms continue to be
consolidated or lost around metropolitan areas, as foods are sourced from
afar at extremely low prices. Tremendous amounts of energy and water used
in production, processing, and transportation are not reflected in the
price of food, and millions of people around the world earn extremely low
wages to keep the global food system going. These
“hidden costs” can be greatly reduced if connections continue to be
strengthened between producers and eaters within regions.
The links between land,
food, and communities, are certainly complicated and difficult to trace.
Many connections go unrecognized by adult eaters, let alone the children
and teens that will shape the future of communities, metropolitan areas,
U.S. agriculture, public health, and related policies with their votes and
dollars. In hopes of
addressing the need for these connections a “farm-to-school” movement
is underway across the country to link the land and the lunchroom by
forging meaningful and direct relationships between area farms and school
cafeterias.
The Wisconsin Homegrown
Lunch project is an exciting initiative in Madison, WI intended to
increase the amount of locally and sustainably grown produce used in
schools, and develop a farm-to-school model for the Midwest.
Funded by USDA Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE),
the project recently completed its first year of research and activities.
This short article will provide an overview of the accomplishments
of the project, lessons learned, and strategies for continuing to build
farm-to-school connections in Madison and across the region.
We hope to raise awareness among organic growers regarding the
significant needs, challenges, and opportunities to build new, reliable
markets while serving children of all income levels in our public schools.
Wisconsin Homegrown Lunch
(WHL) is a joint effort of the University of Wisconsin Center for
Integrated Agricultural Systems (www.wisc.edu/cias) and the non-profit Research,
Education, Action and Policy on Food Group (REAP) (www.reapfoodgroup.org).
With one full-time Project Coordinator, a Graduate Research
Assistant, and the oversight of a professor heavily involved in the
project, WHL relies on partnerships with school foodservice staff,
principals and teachers in three pilot elementary schools, volunteers, and
local organic vegetable growers to work toward the following general
goals:
·
Increase access to
fresh, local produce for Madison school children, beginning in public
elementary schools
·
Build stable markets
for area farms and food producers who prioritize ecologically sound
growing methods
·
Create meaningful
educational links between classrooms, lunchrooms, and local food and
agriculture
Acco
mplishments
Five main accomplishments of the project are
foundational to creating long-term successful markets for area farmers
within the district. First,
the establishment of positive, collaborative relationships with
foodservice and school district staff was critical.
By attending many meetings and committing to cooperative learning
to explore possibilities, the project gained legitimacy and shape.
For instance, the support of the foodservice director allowed us to
meet with various staff members to research the current school food
service arrangement. Support
from a school district curriculum coordinator allowed us to send a flier
through official district mail offering district-wide classroom
presentations. Enthusiasm
from principals and teachers in the three WHL pilot schools has been
integral to nearly every event. Without
a commitment to cooperation, WHL would simply not exist.
Second,
an effective committee of citizen volunteers and an Advisory Committee
comprised of experts from a cross-section of related fields were
established for the duration of the project, which was initially funded
for two years. Third,
educational experiences for elementary students in classrooms and on farms
were offered with the support of principals, teachers, area vegetable
farmers dedicated to education, and volunteers.
An especially rewarding piece of the project, these educational
experiences continue to be designed to increase students’ understanding
of local agriculture, prepare them for special meals, and enhance existing
school curriculum.
The
fourth accomplishment of the project was an initial flow of fresh, local
and organic produce to over 1,300 elementary students in three pilot
schools at picnic lunches in spring 2003 and at fall 2003 Harvest
Festivals. Local farmers,
parents, volunteers, and the local media attended these special events,
which featured items such as homegrown salads, rhubarb muffins, fresh
tortilla wraps, and veggie chili. Principals and teachers agreed to extend
lunch periods for these special events, and encouraged many creative ways
to improve the lunchroom ambience with decorations related to local farms
and nutritious food. Fifth
and finally, we have worked to identify, assess, and disseminate
information about a range of constraints and opportunities facing this
project, which we hope will assist others interested in farm-to-school
possibilities.
Lessons
Learned
In order to forge
connections between small farms and schools, it is important to focus on
building and shaping both supply
and demand at the same time.
It is important to understand which foods currently served in
school cafeterias might be sourced locally, and also to work with
menu-planners to explore ways to feature regional products that are new to
the menu. This certainly
requires creativity and commitment, but also a respect for the framework
in which a particular school foodservice operates.
As part of the beginning
stages of this initiative, we looked closely at other farm-to-school
models across the U.S. We
quickly understood that school food buyers require streamlined ordering
and billing, on-time delivery, and a consistent quality and supply of
products. These
considerations are likely to come into play for any school district,
regardless of size. As we
began our activities in Madison, we discovered in depth the variety of
physical and financial challenges facing the foodservice programs in
larger school districts.
The Madison Metropolitan
School District serves approximately 18,000 meals daily to its 25,000
students in 45 schools. Food
is received and prepared at a centralized production kitchen before being
trucked to schools in individual disposable trays.
Most schools in the district do not have kitchens, and after
waiting in line to receive their plastic-wrapped trays, children have a
very limited amount of time to eat lunch.
Further, the budget dictates that the food costs incurred by the
foodservice for each lunch must be only $0.68
on average.
Fresh
Produce a Unique Possibility- Working within tight budgets to meet
federal nutrition guidelines, schools have historically had access to a
pool of very inexpensive USDA surplus commodity foods such as meats,
dairy, grains, and canned or dried fruits and vegetables. (Recently, USDA commodities are offering a greater variety of
prepared, ready-to-serve foods such as peanut butter and jelly sandwiches,
French toast stix, and other products expand this list just a little.)
Without significant policy
change at the federal level, it is economically infeasible to replace USDA
commodities with locally and sustainably grown counterparts, even when
area supplies of organic meat and dairy products are readily available.
However, fresh produce remains a possibility!
Supply of minimally processed
produce is critical- Staff at the central kitchen are accustomed to
receiving fresh produce in ready-to-serve forms- chopped, dices, shaved,
washed, and bagged- and often do not have the available labor time or
equipment to transform freshly harvested vegetables into meal components
for the thousands of children they serve.
Though foodservice staff has spent extra hours preparing vegetables
for special meals at the three pilot schools, it is nearly impossible to
imagine doing this frequently, especially for the higher volumes of
product to be utilized for district-wide meals.
Fresh-cut produce can easily be purchased from SYSCO and other area
distributors, yet there is currently no source of locally grown,
ready-to-serve produce, due in part to a distinct lack of appropriately
scaled vegetable processing facilities in the region.
Demand
must be increased- Another unexpected hurdle is that the variety and
amount of fresh vegetables used in school lunches is so low. Currently, the district spends approximately $33,000.00 on
fresh vegetables during the school year, which is equivalent to $1.32 per
enrolled student, per year. Further,
elementary students see only a few types of fresh vegetables - shaved baby
carrots, broccoli florets, and shredded iceberg lettuce. It is difficult to simply substitute local vegetables, since
none are available locally in these forms.
Current
Strategies
Continue
education in the schools –
Making connections in classrooms and on farms is an absolutely
critical piece of the future of this project.
While significant changes in school cafeterias may take several
years to implement, children can continue to expand their understanding of
local agriculture and nutrition, and experience a variety of healthy foods
from the land to their tastebuds. By
continuing to offer activities that complement existing curriculum,
teachers and volunteers can expand these educational opportunities.
USDA SARE
(Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education) Proposal- We are
hoping to raise funds from SARE to continue the project from two more
years with a focus on increasing the demand and supply of fresh-cut
produce. While we continue to
work on developing school menus to utilize fresh produce, we are also
continuing to build partnerships with area growers and a local grocery
cooperative to explore ways to prepare fresh produce in a certified
kitchen for delivery to the foodservice.
CAFF
(Central Agriculture and Food Facility) Feasibility Study- Wisconsin
Homegrown Lunch staff are participating in early discussions with
Homegrown Wisconsin Cooperative, Friends of the Dane County Farmers’
Market, Commonwealth Development, and others in Madison to assess the
feasibility for a CAFF in Madison which would include multiple functions
to strengthen links between area producers and eaters, including space for
offices, food storage, processing, distribution, and retail.
Connect
with Potential Suppliers- We are eager to share our stories and hear
the perspectives from vegetable growers in Southern Wisconsin who have an
interest in making direct farm-to-school connections.
If you would like to hear more about Wisconsin Homegrown Lunch and
contribute to an exciting discussion, please attend the meeting on
Saturday, 12:00-2:00 in room Y Lower Level.
Conclusion
The challenges may be many,
but the purpose and potential make farm-to-school a worthwhile approach.
It is important to consider the many aspects of forging
farm-to-school connections from the perspectives of farmers, foodservice
staff, educators, parents, and the future independent consumers
themselves- children. Public
schools are challenging customers for small and mid-scale growers, in that
they operate under more rigid financial and regulatory constraints than
most hospitals, universities, and other institutions. Yet perhaps they are
the most important place to begin. Early
learning experiences taking place in schools shape young people’s lives
in many ways, including strongly influencing eating behaviors, food
preferences, and a recognition of their connections to the world around
them.
Farm-to-school initiatives
are complex puzzles, and will be pieced together differently in each
community. Across the board,
they require cooperation, flexibility, and a willingness to think and work
both inside and outside of the
box. Certainly, if meaningful
and lasting connections between farms and schools can occur, they can work
within other institutions as well, for the benefit of farmers,
communities, and a broad constituency of eaters.
For more information on the Wisconsin Homegrown Lunch project, please
visit our web-site: http://www.reapfoodgroup.org/farmtoschool
or contact Sara Tedeschi, Project Coordinator at (608) 263-6064,
smtedeschi@wisc.edu.